RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The term of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder includes all grades of abnormal placentation. It is crucial for pathologist provide standardized diagnostic assessment to evaluate the outcome of management strategies. Moreover, a correct and safe diagnosis is useful in the medico-legal field when it becomes difficult for the gynecologist to demonstrate the suitability and legitimacy of demolitive treatment. The purposes of our study were: (1) to assess histopathologic features according to the recent guidelines; (2) to determine if immunohistochemistry can be useful to identify extravillous trophoblast (EVT) and to measure the depth of infiltration into the myometrium to improve the diagnosis of PAS. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted on 30 cases of gravid hysterectomy with histopathologic diagnosis of PAS. To identify the depth of EVT, immunohistochemical stainings were performed using anti MNF116 (cytokeratins 5, 6, 8, 17, 19), actin-SM, HPL (Human Placental Lactogen), vimentin and GATA3 antibodies. RESULTS: Our cases were graded based on the degree of invasion of the myometrium. Ten were grade 1 (33.3%), 12 grade 2 (40%) and 8 grade 3A (26.7%). EVT invasion was best seen and evident by double immunostainings with actin-SM and cytokeratins, actin-SM and HPL, actin-SM and GATA3. CONCLUSION: The role of pathologist is decisive to determine the different grades of PAS. A better understanding of the depth of myometrial invasion can be achieved by the use of immunohistochemistry affording an important tool to obtain reproducible grading of PAS. This purpose is crucial in the setting of postoperative quality reviews and particularly in the forensic medicine field.
RESUMEN
Background: Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) with anti-laminin 332 autoantibodies may be associated with malignancies, however, current serological assays have considerable limitations. At present, no commercial test for anti-laminin 332 antibodies is available, restricting the diagnosis to specialized laboratories worldwide. Biochip immunofluorescence microscopy has shown promising results in selected cohorts of laminin 332-MMP patients. Objectives: To detect anti-laminin 332 antibodies by biochip immunofluorescence microscopy in a real-life cohort of MMP patients and compare the results with those from traditional immunoblotting. Materials & Methods: Sera were obtained from 31 patients with MMP, 28 with bullous pemphigoid, five with pemphigus vulgaris, five with paraneoplastic pemphigus, five with linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and 10 controls, and analysed by biochip immunofluorescence using human cells expressing laminin 332. Immunoblotting was performed using purified laminin 332. Results: MMP involved the oral mucosa in 65%, ocular mucosa in 9%, oral and ocular mucosae extensively in 13% as well as other mucosae in 13% of patients. Concomitant cutaneous involvement was reported in 35% of patients. Three MMP patients had an underlying malignancy. Anti-laminin 332 antibodies were detected in 2/31 (6%) cases by both methods. Based on immunoblotting, both laminin 332-positive sera reacted with α3 chain (in one case also with ß3 chain). Both patients with anti-laminin 332 antibodies had extensive mucosal involvement and only one had cancer. Anti-laminin 332 antibodies were not detected in control groups. Conclusion: Biochip immunofluorescence is an appropriate technique to detect anti-laminin 332 antibodies which should be tested in patients with MMP.
